MD InfoWho we are
MD Info is an independent UK-English consumer reference on the games catalogue offered by non gamstop casinos. We do not operate a casino, take affiliate deposits from readers, or route traffic to specific brands. Our editorial focus is descriptive coverage of what the offshore market ships — slot studios, live-dealer partners, table variants, provably-fair originals, RTP transparency — with consumer-warning framing woven throughout.
Editorial approach
Every page on this site is written to a house style that prioritises: (1) accuracy about what the games are and who supplies them; (2) honest disclosure of consumer risk — no UK dispute recourse, weaker player-protection, KYC-at-withdrawal reality; (3) plain UK English without evasion phrases about self-exclusion. We do not name-check individual operators, do not carry affiliate links, and do not run comparison tables of brands. The information that matters is at the studio and category level.
How we work
The reviewer desk walks the game shelves of representative offshore lobbies each quarter, samples titles across categories, opens the game-info screens to record RTP variants, notes changes to studio partnerships and licensing statements, and compares against the UK-licensed baseline. We do not stake real money as part of research; the walkthroughs use demo builds where available and inspect published RTP figures otherwise.
Our editor
Priya Patel — Digital Reviewer. Priya reviews casino game libraries and studio partnerships across offshore operators since 2020, focusing on game quality, RTP transparency, and provider integrity. She writes descriptively about market structure rather than promotionally about operators.
Consumer-warning framing
Non gamstop casinos operate outside the UK Gambling Commission and outside the GamStop self-exclusion register. GamStop is a legitimate consumer-protection scheme and if you are registered with it, the responsible position is to continue that arrangement. This site is not aimed at people seeking to unwind a self-exclusion; every page carries text-mentions of UK problem-gambling support services — GamCare, GordonMoody, NHS National Gambling Clinic, BeGambleAware — so that a reader who needs help can find it.
What we do not cover
We do not review operator brands by name. We do not run bonus comparisons, welcome-offer tables or "best casino for X" listicles. We do not accept sponsored content, native ads or paid guest posts. If you are seeking a curated brand recommendation, this site is not that. If you are seeking a clear, honest picture of what the offshore game shelf actually contains and where the risks sit, this site is written for you.
Why the reviewer angle matters
Coverage of non gamstop casinos on the broader web often falls into two camps. On one side, affiliate portals ranking operators by welcome bonus and payout speed with commercial incentives to promote specific brands. On the other, gambling-support sites focused entirely on harm reduction. Neither camp does a good job of describing the actual game library that sits behind the operator's front page — what studios are integrated, which RTP variants ship to which operators, whether the info screens are legible, and how the shelf compares against the UK-licensed baseline. MD Info was set up to fill that descriptive gap without slipping into either camp.
How UK context frames the coverage
Every page on this site is written for adult UK readers who are not registered with GamStop for problem-gambling reasons. The UK Gambling Commission framework, the GamStop scheme, the 2005 Gambling Act and the 2023 White Paper on reform are the reference points against which we describe what offshore operators do differently. We do not pretend that offshore operators sit inside UK player-protection; the point of the coverage is that they do not, and that the trade-offs need to be understood before anyone deposits a pound.
Contact and corrections
Factual corrections, updates to RTP values that have shifted, and general reader questions are welcome. See our contact page. We aim to respond to substantive editorial correspondence within seven working days. Corrections are logged with the date on the relevant page.